The big news at F&D is the discontinuing of the Mortal Enemy of the Week, since I simply don't have a new Mortal Enemy every single week. What I can do instead is offer you something great to do every week, and this week, it's a visit to one of the many sites that are trying to provide tsunami relief. Give till it hurts, kids.

Paul B: Sweet... Ms. Ali (like Muhammad Ali) could have been King Rama Das's best kept secret in ... [read]

Keith H: With the current heat wave in Minn. I couldn't read a newspaper let alone write for one... <... [read]

GumbyProf: Regardless of anything else in the post, the quality of the apple pancake at the original pancake... [read]

Wayne : The link doesn't seem to go anywhere.... [read]

Linda: Dammit. It goes somewhere, but my stinking hosting company sucks rocks, and I'm probably going to... [read]

lorie: I'd love to hear more about your experience with BlueHost as you settle in there. I'm one of tho... [read]

Linda: So far (knock wood), BlueHost has had a great first... day or so. And the people knocking around ... [read]

Okay, Now We're Really Ready
New Project Update
New Project! New Project!
MTV
I Bet You Didn't Know I Was On "Dynasty"
Best. Weekend. Ever.
The Devil And Rebecca Traister
Just Like The Famous Thingamabob Says!
Expat Mike
Things I Learned This Weekend

Diversions (1)
Girlhood (3)
Journal entries (2)
Losing The Cow (2)
Movies (4)
News Of The Whatever (14)
Not Even Sporting (14)
Politics (8)
Roundups (4)
Site news (9)
TV And So Forth (7)
The Excellent (10)
Things That Happened (14)
Yucky Love Stuff (1)


Want an email
when the site is updated?

Drop your email in the box:


Powered by NotifyList.com
reading
Which Brings Me To You, The Wal-Mart Effect, Desperate Networks
reading
Adem, Bruce Springsteen, Harvey Danger, Sweet Honey In The Rock
reading
NewsRadio Season Three, assorted season finales, The People's Court
reading
They're very cool over at movabletype

and, of course, everyone at
The Damn Hell Ass Kings

Design and skinning by
this blog's got moxie!
December 31, 2004
Sorry If You're Just Not That Into A Follow-Up

I was originally going to put this in comments, but then I kind of went on, as I do, and it seemed better to just make an entry for it.

People brought up quirkyalone.net, and . . . to be perfectly honest with you, the Quirkyalone thing doesn't work for me either. That feels more defiant about being single than I feel. I'm not single on purpose. I'm not single because I find coupledom stifling (let alone "tyranny"), or because I am intentionally being very, very cautious, or because I'm any more "independent-thinking" than my friends who are married.

Look, I envy the people I know who are in good relationships. I envy them wildly at times, the same way I envy people who have really satisfying careers or beautiful children or the ability to say they have done something to help humanity. I gaze at good marriages with a lot of awe and admiration, and I absolutely want that for myself, and I'm not here to tell you "Fuck the couplearchy, I'll take a good book." There are people who believe that and feel that way, but for me, when I slide in that direction, it's because I'm sad.

I'm single because I haven't ever met a person I particularly wanted who particularly wanted me at the right time for it to work, where the logistics were favorable and everyone was single and the obstacles were manageable. That's what I think. It's . . . you know, it's not sorcery.

There are endlessly interesting things to say about single people and relationships and dating and gender differences and how people relate to each other, and I'm not in any way suggesting otherwise. What I'm saying is that a book that says that the entire history of failed relationships is the history of men who aren't "into" women and women who insist on believing they are is just . . . stupid. And simplistic and insulting. I know plenty of women whose biggest obstacle has been accepting the idea that anyone is "into" them, or at least really taking it into their hearts enough to not constantly scan the horizon for signs of trouble, as a result of which their relationships droop and die from the stress.

It's just . . . it's more complicated than this stupid caricature of women chasing men around with butterfly nets, trying to get that goddamn wedding ring before they get too old.

Among other things? The book isn't funny. Seriously. For a book by comedians, it's totally and completely devoid of wit. I think you can, as the comments on this entry, even, have suggested, approach this stuff without being so damn mean. There's such a thing as acknowledging the truth of some stereotypes in a sort of affectionate way.

For example, my marvelous friend FlyBoy once told me quite sincerely, "You have to understand that all guys secretly believe the song 'Desperado' was written about them." And whenever I think about that, I do laugh with a lot of love for all of the guys I've known and chased and been chased by, because . . . well, yeah, that's kind of true. And there's some truth to some of the ones about women, too, like the fact that we often (on the whole, on average, with plenty of exceptions) spend way too much time parsing what men are saying. (I used to occasionally ask my friend The Professor to take a shot at interpreting something a guy said to me, to which he almost always responded, "I guarantee you that just by asking me about it, you have thought about it more than he did when he said it.")

It just doesn't translate into anyone's singleness being a character flaw or the result of stupidity or the need to stop making "excuses." People are strange and wonderful and kind of baffling, and although they bug and frustrate and bore me and there's really only a small slice of them I'm ever going to really be able to relate to at the level of closeness everybody kind of craves, they're also sort of the only game in town. So what are you going to do?

04:50 PM | trackback (77)