|
July 07, 2002
You know, when I read about people who run with the bulls, I always wonder what exactly they want out of the experience. It's like, nobody wants to get gored, but everybody loses if nobody gets gored. It's the prisoner's dilemma of risking your life. Speaking of prisoner's dilemmas, I am becoming a fan of both Friend or Foe and Russian Roulette on the Game Show Network. If you haven't been watching, FoF is a classic prisoner's dilemma -- you and your partner have a pot of money at the end. If you both vote "Friend," you split it. If one votes "Foe" and the other votes "Friend," the "Foe" voter gets all of it. If both vote "Foe," nobody gets anything. The wonderful thing about it is that I can prove you should always vote Friend, and I can also prove you should always vote Foe. I can also prove that no matter how much they tell you that the trick is to figure out what your partner is going to do, it actually doesn't help you all that much to know what your partner is going to do. It is the fact that I am interested in that kind of thing but appreciate the opportunity to shrug and put it down when it starts to make my head hurt that makes me a writer, and not an academic. As for Russian Roulette, when you lose, then drop you through a hole in the floor. That's pretty much all there is to it. You'd be surprised how entertaining it is. I laugh every time. And over at the Food Network, I watched a bunch of shows on July 4th about various regional festivals around the country. Very cool, including a half-hour about the Lobster Festival in Rockland, Maine, which is about ten minutes away from the little house where my family stayed, which I recently wrote about over in the journal. Strange things on cable have been my delight of late. I don't know why. Posted by Alison-Jane at July 07, 2002 12:42 PMComments
I finally caught the two game shows last night, thanks to your heads-up. Both are fun, and I especially enjoy the prisoner's-dilemma element of Friend or Foe. I actually participated in a version of this years ago, when I made little bits of extra money volunteering to be in experiments in the Psych Department when I was an undergrad. Two of us showed up, and we were told we were playing each other in a Friend or Foe game, pushing one of two buttons each (a screen separated us so we couldn't see the other directly). After a couple of figuring-out moves, I went for straight Friend, maximizing our payment by making sure we both got a moderate amount each turn. But there was a twist. When we went to the dept. window to be paid, I was expecting we'd get about the same. But I received a lot more (that is to say, a few dollars more) than the other guy. That didn't make sense in view of my game choices. So I found my way back to the experiment room and was able to ask the guy in charge about this. He told me: we'd each actually been playing against our own previous move! (Two simultaneous unconnected games, in other words.) So if you played Foe, you were actually messing with your own next score, and if you played Friend, you'd win something on every turn. Pretty cute. Posted by: Rinaldo on July 18, 2002 07:01 AMPost a comment
|